This elegant idea was proposed on the youtube forums under a discussion of ID vs. Evolution.
"I do not think that at anytime throughout the course of human history we will ever discovery a 100 percent accurate understanding of reality in its full scope unless by some chance we become the very definition of gods."
I found that this thought held true even after extensive scrutiny of logic. The basic learning processes we as humans posses dont allow for all that much flexibility.... There are:
1. Experience.
A sure method of comprehension; to experience is to understand. In direct correlation to the above proposition: The only way to understand a person is to be that person, hence the classical notion of: to defeat a monster one must himself become a monster or in modern context as crime investigators often say to understand and eventually stop a serial killer one must get in his/her head and in a comparable sense, become the killer.
2. Teachings.
Essentially language enabled learning which includes both auditory and visual stimulus.
The latter can be eliminated since we humans aren't provided a handbook on how god works (no, the bible doesnt count) the only methodology remaining for understanding god is experience.
To become gods; is this the ultimate purpose; the end of evolution? To transcend the very nature of our existence?
___________________________________________________________ On Intelligent Design:
It seems to me that the hypothetical creation of a digital universe (essentially a highly advanced videogame) is simply a modern translation of the classic clockmaker metaphor for god and his peculiar machinations. It is vastly more effective under the newly enabled possibilities of virtual reality and virtual intelligences; however this does not denote credibility.
In any case, if you did create a videogame with highly advanced Artificial intelligences roaming a digital universe would you give the programmed A.I. the playing manual? Or rather a guidebook concerning the process by which the very universe in which they exist was created? No of course not. What would be the point of it all then?
If this videogame designer metaphor were true then might I suppose or rather propose that God has been AFK (Away-From-Keyboard) for far, far too long
Rather he might have stopped playing the game entirely and left it running on auto-pilot.
When will we stop playing the game? When we learn once and for all how to win?
Should we be contented with having obtained the playing manual or should we reach for the guidebook; the blue prints and schematics; the very hand of god?
Im an atheist but Im not close minded. I dont believe in the classical conceptions of god(s). All of this postulation brings me to a point, that we humans are God. humans are the only beings who can appreciate beauty, without us the concept vanishes from the universe. How is it we see and feel that which cannot be seen? Without us the notion of god is gone, and in a sense this means that we are an essential factor and quite possibly the whole.
Ranting as always,
-REV
__________________
_____________________________________\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Clubs and the sort' :
Superbly talented artists and friends. Also a rather large majority of halo junkies, like me : ) ///


